Llama 4 Scout vs Pixtral Large
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, and use case fit.
M
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
M
Pixtral Large
Mistral
Capability radar
Normalized coding, reasoning, writing, vision, context, and value
Llama 4 ScoutPixtral Large
| Metric | Llama 4 Scout | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price / 1M | $0.15 | $2.00 |
| Output Price / 1M | $0.50 | $6.00 |
| Combined Price / 1M | $0.65 | $8.00 |
| Context Window | 10,000,000 | 128,000 |
| Coding Score | 83 | 83 |
| Reasoning Score | 85 | 84 |
| Vision Score | 82 | 93 |
| Audio | No | No |
| Streaming | Yes | Yes |
| Function Calling | Yes | Yes |
| Latency Tier | standard | standard |
| Release Date | 3/5/2025 | 11/18/2024 |
Llama 4 Scout — Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths
- 10M context
- Open weights
- Document RAG
Weaknesses
- Extreme context has throughput tradeoffs
Pixtral Large — Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths
- Excellent vision
- EU hosting
Weaknesses
- General reasoning below Claude/GPT
Use Case Verdicts
Enterprise Use
Llama 4 Scout combines strong reasoning, tooling, and context for enterprise workloads.
Agent Workflows
Llama 4 Scout is better suited for agentic workflows with tool use and coding capability.