Llama 3.3 70B vs Llama 4 Maverick
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, and use case fit.
M
Llama 3.3 70B
Meta
M
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
Capability radar
Normalized coding, reasoning, writing, vision, context, and value
Llama 3.3 70BLlama 4 Maverick
| Metric | Llama 3.3 70B | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price / 1M | $0.23 | $0.20 |
| Output Price / 1M | $0.40 | $0.60 |
| Combined Price / 1M | $0.63 | $0.80 |
| Context Window | 128,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Coding Score | 84 | 87 |
| Reasoning Score | 82 | 88 |
| Vision Score | 45 | 85 |
| Audio | No | No |
| Streaming | Yes | Yes |
| Function Calling | Yes | Yes |
| Latency Tier | standard | standard |
| Release Date | 12/6/2024 | 3/5/2025 |
Llama 3.3 70B — Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths
- Open weights
- Low hosting cost
- Strong coding
Weaknesses
- No native vision
- Self-hosting required
Llama 4 Maverick — Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths
- 1M open context
- Multimodal
- Very low API cost
Weaknesses
- Newer ecosystem
- Variable hosted quality
Use Case Verdicts
Enterprise Use
Llama 4 Maverick combines strong reasoning, tooling, and context for enterprise workloads.
Agent Workflows
Llama 4 Maverick is better suited for agentic workflows with tool use and coding capability.