SummitGovOnline

GPT-4.1 Nano vs Llama 4 Maverick

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, and use case fit.

O

GPT-4.1 Nano

OpenAI

Overall 70
fast
View model →
M

Llama 4 Maverick

Meta

Overall 86
standard
View model →

Capability radar

Normalized coding, reasoning, writing, vision, context, and value

CodingReasoningWritingVisionContextValue
GPT-4.1 NanoLlama 4 Maverick
Comparison of GPT-4.1 Nano vs Llama 4 Maverick
MetricGPT-4.1 NanoLlama 4 Maverick
Input Price / 1M$0.10$0.20
Output Price / 1M$0.40$0.60
Combined Price / 1M$0.50$0.80
Context Window1,047,5761,000,000
Coding Score7587
Reasoning Score7288
Vision Score6085
AudioNoNo
StreamingYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
Latency Tierfaststandard
Release Date4/14/20253/5/2025

GPT-4.1 Nano — Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

  • Lowest OpenAI cost
  • 1M context

Weaknesses

  • Limited on complex generation

Llama 4 Maverick — Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

  • 1M open context
  • Multimodal
  • Very low API cost

Weaknesses

  • Newer ecosystem
  • Variable hosted quality

Use Case Verdicts

Coding

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick scores 87 vs 75 on coding benchmarks.

General Chat

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick leads on writing quality (82 vs 74).

Long Context

GPT-4.1 Nano

GPT-4.1 Nano offers 1M tokens vs 1M.

Cost Efficiency

GPT-4.1 Nano

GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper at $0.50/M combined vs $0.80/M.

Enterprise Use

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick combines strong reasoning, tooling, and context for enterprise workloads.

Agent Workflows

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick is better suited for agentic workflows with tool use and coding capability.