SummitGovOnline

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, and use case fit.

G

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Google

Overall 92
fast
View model →
M

Llama 4 Scout

Meta

Overall 82
standard
View model →

Capability radar

Normalized coding, reasoning, writing, vision, context, and value

CodingReasoningWritingVisionContextValue
Gemini 3.6 FlashLlama 4 Scout
Comparison of Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout
MetricGemini 3.6 FlashLlama 4 Scout
Input Price / 1M$1.50$0.15
Output Price / 1M$7.50$0.50
Combined Price / 1M$9.00$0.65
Context Window1,000,00010,000,000
Coding Score9183
Reasoning Score9285
Vision Score9482
AudioYesNo
StreamingYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
Latency Tierfaststandard
Release Date7/21/20263/5/2025

Gemini 3.6 Flash — Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

  • Fast latency
  • Strong multimodal
  • Large context

Weaknesses

  • Pricing varies by endpoint/region

Llama 4 Scout — Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

  • 10M context
  • Open weights
  • Document RAG

Weaknesses

  • Extreme context has throughput tradeoffs

Use Case Verdicts

Coding

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash scores 91 vs 83 on coding benchmarks.

General Chat

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash leads on writing quality (90 vs 79).

Long Context

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout offers 10M tokens vs 1M.

Cost Efficiency

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper at $0.65/M combined vs $9.00/M.

Enterprise Use

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout combines strong reasoning, tooling, and context for enterprise workloads.

Agent Workflows

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash is better suited for agentic workflows with tool use and coding capability.