Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, and use case fit.
G
Gemini 3.6 Flash
M
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
Capability radar
Normalized coding, reasoning, writing, vision, context, and value
Gemini 3.6 FlashLlama 4 Scout
| Metric | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price / 1M | $1.50 | $0.15 |
| Output Price / 1M | $7.50 | $0.50 |
| Combined Price / 1M | $9.00 | $0.65 |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 | 10,000,000 |
| Coding Score | 91 | 83 |
| Reasoning Score | 92 | 85 |
| Vision Score | 94 | 82 |
| Audio | Yes | No |
| Streaming | Yes | Yes |
| Function Calling | Yes | Yes |
| Latency Tier | fast | standard |
| Release Date | 7/21/2026 | 3/5/2025 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash — Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths
- Fast latency
- Strong multimodal
- Large context
Weaknesses
- Pricing varies by endpoint/region
Llama 4 Scout — Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths
- 10M context
- Open weights
- Document RAG
Weaknesses
- Extreme context has throughput tradeoffs
Use Case Verdicts
Enterprise Use
Llama 4 Scout combines strong reasoning, tooling, and context for enterprise workloads.
Agent Workflows
Gemini 3.6 Flash is better suited for agentic workflows with tool use and coding capability.
