DeepSeek V4 vs Kimi K2
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, and use case fit.
D
DeepSeek V4
DeepSeek
MA
Kimi K2
Moonshot AI
Capability radar
Normalized coding, reasoning, writing, vision, context, and value
DeepSeek V4Kimi K2
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 | Kimi K2 |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.60 |
| Output Price / 1M | $1.20 | $2.50 |
| Combined Price / 1M | $1.50 | $3.10 |
| Context Window | 163,840 | 131,072 |
| Coding Score | 92 | 90 |
| Reasoning Score | 90 | 88 |
| Vision Score | 35 | 40 |
| Audio | No | No |
| Streaming | Yes | Yes |
| Function Calling | Yes | Yes |
| Latency Tier | fast | fast |
| Release Date | 6/1/2026 | 7/11/2025 |
DeepSeek V4 — Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths
- Very low cost
- Strong coding
- Open-weight path
Weaknesses
- Weaker multimodal
Kimi K2 — Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths
- Strong coding
- Tool use
- Value pricing
Weaknesses
- Superseded by Kimi K3 on context/vision
Use Case Verdicts
Enterprise Use
DeepSeek V4 combines strong reasoning, tooling, and context for enterprise workloads.
Agent Workflows
DeepSeek V4 is better suited for agentic workflows with tool use and coding capability.