SummitGovOnline

DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Llama 3.1 405B

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, and use case fit.

D

DeepSeek V3 0324

DeepSeek

Overall 79
standard
View model →
M

Llama 3.1 405B

Meta

Overall 74
slow
View model →

Capability radar

Normalized coding, reasoning, writing, vision, context, and value

CodingReasoningWritingVisionContextValue
DeepSeek V3 0324Llama 3.1 405B
Comparison of DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Llama 3.1 405B
MetricDeepSeek V3 0324Llama 3.1 405B
Input Price / 1M$0.27$0.35
Output Price / 1M$1.10$0.70
Combined Price / 1M$1.37$1.05
Context Window128,000128,000
Coding Score9285
Reasoning Score9186
Vision Score4540
AudioNoNo
StreamingYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
Latency Tierstandardslow
Release Date3/24/20257/23/2024

DeepSeek V3 0324 — Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

  • Best price-performance
  • 128K context

Weaknesses

  • Geopolitical/hosting considerations

Llama 3.1 405B — Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

  • Open 405B weights
  • Strong reasoning

Weaknesses

  • High inference cost
  • No multimodal

Use Case Verdicts

Coding

DeepSeek V3 0324

DeepSeek V3 0324 scores 92 vs 85 on coding benchmarks.

General Chat

DeepSeek V3 0324

DeepSeek V3 0324 leads on writing quality (86 vs 83).

Long Context

DeepSeek V3 0324

DeepSeek V3 0324 offers 128K tokens vs 128K.

Cost Efficiency

Llama 3.1 405B

Llama 3.1 405B is cheaper at $1.05/M combined vs $1.37/M.

Enterprise Use

DeepSeek V3 0324

DeepSeek V3 0324 combines strong reasoning, tooling, and context for enterprise workloads.

Agent Workflows

DeepSeek V3 0324

DeepSeek V3 0324 is better suited for agentic workflows with tool use and coding capability.