SummitGovOnline

Command R+ vs Llama 3.1 405B

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, and use case fit.

C

Command R+

Cohere

Overall 77
standard
View model →
M

Llama 3.1 405B

Meta

Overall 74
slow
View model →

Capability radar

Normalized coding, reasoning, writing, vision, context, and value

CodingReasoningWritingVisionContextValue
Command R+Llama 3.1 405B
Comparison of Command R+ vs Llama 3.1 405B
MetricCommand R+Llama 3.1 405B
Input Price / 1M$2.50$0.35
Output Price / 1M$10.00$0.70
Combined Price / 1M$12.50$1.05
Context Window128,000128,000
Coding Score8285
Reasoning Score8486
Vision Score5540
AudioNoNo
StreamingYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
Latency Tierstandardslow
Release Date4/4/20247/23/2024

Command R+ — Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

  • Excellent RAG
  • Citation grounding
  • Enterprise focus

Weaknesses

  • No vision
  • Higher output cost

Llama 3.1 405B — Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

  • Open 405B weights
  • Strong reasoning

Weaknesses

  • High inference cost
  • No multimodal

Use Case Verdicts

Coding

Llama 3.1 405B

Llama 3.1 405B scores 85 vs 82 on coding benchmarks.

General Chat

Command R+

Command R+ leads on writing quality (86 vs 83).

Long Context

Command R+

Command R+ offers 128K tokens vs 128K.

Cost Efficiency

Llama 3.1 405B

Llama 3.1 405B is cheaper at $1.05/M combined vs $12.50/M.

Enterprise Use

Llama 3.1 405B

Llama 3.1 405B combines strong reasoning, tooling, and context for enterprise workloads.

Agent Workflows

Llama 3.1 405B

Llama 3.1 405B is better suited for agentic workflows with tool use and coding capability.