Codestral vs Mistral Small
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, and use case fit.
M
Codestral
Mistral
M
Mistral Small
Mistral
Capability radar
Normalized coding, reasoning, writing, vision, context, and value
CodestralMistral Small
| Metric | Codestral | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.10 |
| Output Price / 1M | $0.90 | $0.30 |
| Combined Price / 1M | $1.20 | $0.40 |
| Context Window | 256,000 | 32,000 |
| Coding Score | 94 | 77 |
| Reasoning Score | 78 | 76 |
| Vision Score | 30 | 45 |
| Audio | No | No |
| Streaming | Yes | Yes |
| Function Calling | Yes | Yes |
| Latency Tier | fast | fast |
| Release Date | 1/15/2025 | 1/30/2025 |
Codestral — Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths
- Top-tier coding
- 256K context
- Fill-in-the-middle
Weaknesses
- Not for general chat
- No vision
Mistral Small — Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths
- Very low cost
- Fast
Weaknesses
- 32K context limit
- No vision
Use Case Verdicts
Enterprise Use
Codestral combines strong reasoning, tooling, and context for enterprise workloads.
Agent Workflows
Codestral is better suited for agentic workflows with tool use and coding capability.