Claude 4 Opus vs Kimi K3
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, and use case fit.
A
Claude 4 Opus
Anthropic
MA
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI
Capability radar
Normalized coding, reasoning, writing, vision, context, and value
Claude 4 OpusKimi K3
| Metric | Claude 4 Opus | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price / 1M | $15.00 | $3.00 |
| Output Price / 1M | $75.00 | $15.00 |
| Combined Price / 1M | $90.00 | $18.00 |
| Context Window | 200,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Coding Score | 97 | 93 |
| Reasoning Score | 97 | 94 |
| Vision Score | 93 | 88 |
| Audio | No | No |
| Streaming | Yes | Yes |
| Function Calling | Yes | Yes |
| Latency Tier | reasoning | standard |
| Release Date | 5/22/2025 | 7/16/2026 |
Claude 4 Opus — Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths
- Best-in-class reasoning
- Exceptional coding
- Long-form writing
Weaknesses
- Highest API cost
- 200K context only
Kimi K3 — Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths
- 1M context
- Frontier coding/reasoning
- Native multimodal
Weaknesses
- Premium output pricing
- Newer ecosystem tooling
Use Case Verdicts
Enterprise Use
Kimi K3 combines strong reasoning, tooling, and context for enterprise workloads.
Agent Workflows
Claude 4 Opus is better suited for agentic workflows with tool use and coding capability.