SummitGovOnline

Claude 4 Opus vs DeepSeek R1

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, and use case fit.

A

Claude 4 Opus

Anthropic

Overall 96
reasoning
View model →
D

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek

Overall 77
reasoning
View model →

Capability radar

Normalized coding, reasoning, writing, vision, context, and value

CodingReasoningWritingVisionContextValue
Claude 4 OpusDeepSeek R1
Comparison of Claude 4 Opus vs DeepSeek R1
MetricClaude 4 OpusDeepSeek R1
Input Price / 1M$15.00$0.55
Output Price / 1M$75.00$2.19
Combined Price / 1M$90.00$2.74
Context Window200,00064,000
Coding Score9794
Reasoning Score9795
Vision Score9335
AudioNoNo
StreamingYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
Latency Tierreasoningreasoning
Release Date5/22/20251/20/2025

Claude 4 Opus — Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

  • Best-in-class reasoning
  • Exceptional coding
  • Long-form writing

Weaknesses

  • Highest API cost
  • 200K context only

DeepSeek R1 — Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

  • Reasoning at low cost
  • Open weights available

Weaknesses

  • No vision
  • Slower inference
  • 64K context

Use Case Verdicts

Coding

Claude 4 Opus

Claude 4 Opus scores 97 vs 94 on coding benchmarks.

General Chat

Claude 4 Opus

Claude 4 Opus leads on writing quality (96 vs 82).

Long Context

Claude 4 Opus

Claude 4 Opus offers 200K tokens vs 64K.

Cost Efficiency

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek R1 is cheaper at $2.74/M combined vs $90.00/M.

Enterprise Use

Claude 4 Opus

Claude 4 Opus combines strong reasoning, tooling, and context for enterprise workloads.

Agent Workflows

Claude 4 Opus

Claude 4 Opus is better suited for agentic workflows with tool use and coding capability.