SummitGovOnline

Claude 4 Opus vs Command A

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, and use case fit.

A

Claude 4 Opus

Anthropic

Overall 96
reasoning
View model →
C

Command A

Cohere

Overall 82
standard
View model →

Capability radar

Normalized coding, reasoning, writing, vision, context, and value

CodingReasoningWritingVisionContextValue
Claude 4 OpusCommand A
Comparison of Claude 4 Opus vs Command A
MetricClaude 4 OpusCommand A
Input Price / 1M$15.00$2.50
Output Price / 1M$75.00$10.00
Combined Price / 1M$90.00$12.50
Context Window200,000256,000
Coding Score9784
Reasoning Score9786
Vision Score9372
AudioNoNo
StreamingYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
Latency Tierreasoningstandard
Release Date5/22/20253/13/2025

Claude 4 Opus — Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

  • Best-in-class reasoning
  • Exceptional coding
  • Long-form writing

Weaknesses

  • Highest API cost
  • 200K context only

Command A — Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

  • Agentic workflows
  • 256K context
  • Enterprise SLAs

Weaknesses

  • Premium pricing
  • Smaller community

Use Case Verdicts

Coding

Claude 4 Opus

Claude 4 Opus scores 97 vs 84 on coding benchmarks.

General Chat

Claude 4 Opus

Claude 4 Opus leads on writing quality (96 vs 87).

Long Context

Command A

Command A offers 256K tokens vs 200K.

Cost Efficiency

Command A

Command A is cheaper at $12.50/M combined vs $90.00/M.

Enterprise Use

Claude 4 Opus

Claude 4 Opus combines strong reasoning, tooling, and context for enterprise workloads.

Agent Workflows

Claude 4 Opus

Claude 4 Opus is better suited for agentic workflows with tool use and coding capability.