SummitGovOnline

Claude 3 Opus vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, and use case fit.

A

Claude 3 Opus

Anthropic

Overall 90
standard
View model →
G

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Google

Overall 92
fast
View model →

Capability radar

Normalized coding, reasoning, writing, vision, context, and value

CodingReasoningWritingVisionContextValue
Claude 3 OpusGemini 3.6 Flash
Comparison of Claude 3 Opus vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
MetricClaude 3 OpusGemini 3.6 Flash
Input Price / 1M$15.00$1.50
Output Price / 1M$75.00$7.50
Combined Price / 1M$90.00$9.00
Context Window200,0001,000,000
Coding Score9091
Reasoning Score9192
Vision Score8594
AudioNoYes
StreamingYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
Latency Tierstandardfast
Release Date3/4/20247/21/2026

Claude 3 Opus — Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

  • Exceptional writing
  • Proven reliability

Weaknesses

  • Superseded by Claude 4
  • High cost

Gemini 3.6 Flash — Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

  • Fast latency
  • Strong multimodal
  • Large context

Weaknesses

  • Pricing varies by endpoint/region

Use Case Verdicts

Coding

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash scores 91 vs 90 on coding benchmarks.

General Chat

Claude 3 Opus

Claude 3 Opus leads on writing quality (93 vs 90).

Long Context

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash offers 1M tokens vs 200K.

Cost Efficiency

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper at $9.00/M combined vs $90.00/M.

Enterprise Use

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash combines strong reasoning, tooling, and context for enterprise workloads.

Agent Workflows

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash is better suited for agentic workflows with tool use and coding capability.