SummitGovOnline

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Grok 3 Mini

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, and use case fit.

A

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Anthropic

Overall 79
fast
View model →
X

Grok 3 Mini

xAI

Overall 77
fast
View model →

Capability radar

Normalized coding, reasoning, writing, vision, context, and value

CodingReasoningWritingVisionContextValue
Claude 3.5 HaikuGrok 3 Mini
Comparison of Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Grok 3 Mini
MetricClaude 3.5 HaikuGrok 3 Mini
Input Price / 1M$0.80$0.30
Output Price / 1M$4.00$0.50
Combined Price / 1M$4.80$0.80
Context Window200,000131,072
Coding Score7879
Reasoning Score8080
Vision Score7570
AudioNoNo
StreamingYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
Latency Tierfastfast
Release Date10/22/20242/17/2025

Claude 3.5 Haiku — Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

  • Low latency
  • Good writing quality

Weaknesses

  • Smaller context than competitors

Grok 3 Mini — Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

  • Very affordable
  • Fast responses

Weaknesses

  • Less capable than full Grok 3

Use Case Verdicts

Coding

Grok 3 Mini

Grok 3 Mini scores 79 vs 78 on coding benchmarks.

General Chat

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude 3.5 Haiku leads on writing quality (82 vs 78).

Long Context

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude 3.5 Haiku offers 200K tokens vs 131.1K.

Cost Efficiency

Grok 3 Mini

Grok 3 Mini is cheaper at $0.80/M combined vs $4.80/M.

Enterprise Use

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude 3.5 Haiku combines strong reasoning, tooling, and context for enterprise workloads.

Agent Workflows

Grok 3 Mini

Grok 3 Mini is better suited for agentic workflows with tool use and coding capability.