SummitGovOnline

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, benchmarks, and use case fit.

A

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Anthropic

Overall 79
fast
View model →
G

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Google

Overall 92
fast
View model →

Capability radar

Normalized coding, reasoning, writing, vision, context, and value

CodingReasoningWritingVisionContextValue
Claude 3.5 HaikuGemini 3.6 Flash
Comparison of Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
MetricClaude 3.5 HaikuGemini 3.6 Flash
Input Price / 1M$0.80$1.50
Output Price / 1M$4.00$7.50
Combined Price / 1M$4.80$9.00
Context Window200,0001,000,000
Coding Score7891
Reasoning Score8092
Vision Score7594
AudioNoYes
StreamingYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
Latency Tierfastfast
Release Date10/22/20247/21/2026

Claude 3.5 Haiku — Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

  • Low latency
  • Good writing quality

Weaknesses

  • Smaller context than competitors

Gemini 3.6 Flash — Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths

  • Fast latency
  • Strong multimodal
  • Large context

Weaknesses

  • Pricing varies by endpoint/region

Use Case Verdicts

Coding

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash scores 91 vs 78 on coding benchmarks.

General Chat

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash leads on writing quality (90 vs 82).

Long Context

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash offers 1M tokens vs 200K.

Cost Efficiency

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper at $4.80/M combined vs $9.00/M.

Enterprise Use

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash combines strong reasoning, tooling, and context for enterprise workloads.

Agent Workflows

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash is better suited for agentic workflows with tool use and coding capability.